Employment & Benefits

employment-lawThe Employment and Benefits team at Briskman & Binion, P.C. has experience in all areas of employment and benefits law, labor relations, and employee benefit issues. From counseling employers on decisions and strategies to defending them in litigation, our attorneys seek to provide the highest quality of legal services in a prompt, cost-effective and successful manner.

CLICK HERE to contact the law firm of Briskman & Binion today.

Cases

Kitsos v. Mobile Gas Service Corp., 404 So.2d 40 (Ala. 1981);

 

Charter Southland Hosp., Inc. v. Eades, 521 So.2d 981 (Ala. 1988);

 

Mobile, Al – Pensacola, Fl Bldg. & Const. Trade Council v. Daugherty, 684 F.Supp. 270 (S.D. Ala. 1988);

 

C,P, & B Enterprises vs. Mellert, 762 So.2d 356 (Ala. 2000);

 

Rabb v. Georgia Pacific, LLC, 2010 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 75094 (S.D. Ala. 2010)

The firm was successful with referring attorneys on a motion for summary judgment on all claims for its client in this employment dispute.

 

Gibbs v. Georgia-Pacific Wood Products, LLC, 2009 U.S. Dist. LEXIS (S.D. Ala. 2009)

The firm was successful with referring attorneys on a motion for summary judgment on behalf of its client in a case involving employee benefits.

 

Patterson v. United Parcel Service, 2009 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 14911 (S.D. Ala. 2009)

The firm was successful with the referring attorneys on a motion for summary judgment on behalf of its client in a case involving racial and gender discrimination.

 

Richardson v. Georgia Pacific Corporation, 2005 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 39535 (S.D. Ala. 2005)

The firm was successful with the referring attorneys on a motion for summary judgment on behalf of its client in a case alleging employment discrimination.

 

Ex parte Hudson, 866 So.2d 1115 (Ala. 2003)

The firm obtained a petition for writ of mandamus from the Supreme Court of Alabama for its client in a case denying claims of immunity.

 

Disclaimer: These recoveries and testimonials are not an indication of future results. Every case is different, and regardless of what friends, family, or other individuals may say about what a case is worth, each case must be evaluated on its own facts and circumstances as they apply to the law. The valuation of a case depends on the facts, the injuries, the jurisdiction, the venue, the witnesses, the parties, and the testimony, among other factors. Furthermore, no representation is made that the quality of the legal services to be performed is greater than the quality of legal services performed by other lawyers.

Copyright © 2017 Briskman and Binion. All Rights Reserved. | Powered by e-worc Web and New Media Web and New Media.