For a family law attorney Mobile, AL residents trust, turn to Briskman & Binion, P.C. We offer domestic and family law legal services to clients across Mobile, AL. Our lawyers aggressively represent our clients involved in family-related claims and disputes. With the changing legal landscape in Alabama concerning marriage, we believe a new type of client will be seeking family law advice and representation, perhaps including couples who are involved in same sex marriages or family members who have raised child custody issues related to same sex marriage relationships. The law in Alabama has changed due to recent federal court rulings over marriage licenses, and we believe many people will have lots of questions about the effect of the changes. We also work with our clients to resolve issues that arise throughout marriage, including spousal abuse, legitimacy, adoption, surrogacy, custody, and child abuse.
Because of the volatile, high-stakes nature of familial conflict, it is generally recommended that you seek advice and counsel from a qualified family law attorney to help find a resolution for your family and make sure that you aren’t unwittingly giving up your legal rights. Our trusted family law attorneys are skilled at drafting and negotiating contracts, litigating contested matters, and counseling clients on their legal rights. We understand that family disputes are extremely personal and sensitive matters. We want to help alleviate your pain and take special care to show compassion to you and your family throughout the legal process.
If you’re in need of a family law attorney, Mobile, AL –based Law Office of Briskman & Binion, P.C. is here to help. Contact us today to discuss any family-related claims and contract disputes. We have successfully helped clients with cases involving parental rights, disputes over property, child custody, grandparent visitation, and more. Let our experienced lawyers get you and your family on track to a happier life.
CLICK HERE to contact the law firm of Briskman & Binion today.
Ex Parte Smith, 429 So.2d 1050 (Ala. 1983)
On appeal in the Supreme Court of Alabama, the firm was successful in obtaining a reversal of the trial court’s judgment for its client in a case involving modification of a divorce decree resulting from a dispute over real property.
Buckhalter v. Ala. Dept. of Pensions & Sec., 484 So.2d 1119 (Ala.Civ.App. 1986)
In the Court of Civil Appeals, the firm was successful in obtaining a reversal of judgment in a case involving termination of parental rights.
Ex Parte Beckham, 643 So.2d 1373 (Ala. 1994)
In the Supreme Court of Alabama, the firm was successful in obtaining a reversal of judgment of the Court of Civil Appeals for its client in a case involving child custody.
B.R.O. v. G.C.O., 646 So.2d 126 (Ala. 1994)
In the Court of Civil Appeals, the firm was successful in defending an appeal against its client in a case involving a grandmother’s petition for an award of visitation with her grandchildren.
McMillian v. State of Alabama, 2010 Ala. Crim. App. LEXIS 4
McMillan was an appeal of a conviction of domestic violence first degree. In order to sustain a conviction of domestic violence first degree the State of Alabama was required to prove that the injuries resulted from an assault with a deadly weapon. The Defendant had allegedly bitten his spouse’s eye out of its socket. As no weapon was utilized in the assault, the only “weapon” was the defendant’s teeth, a body part. As the term “deadly weapon” has been defined to exclude a body part, the Supreme Court vacated the conviction.
Woodward v. Nor-Am Chem. Chem. Co., 1996 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 7372;
In the United States District Court for the Southern District of Alabama, the firm successfully obtained a class action Settlement on behalf of its client in a case involving occupational exposure to agricultural pesticides.
Johnson v. Norwest Financial Alabama, 1996 U.S. U.S. Dist. LEXIS 22319;
In US District Court, the firm was successful in upholding its client’s original verdict in a class action settlement involving life insurance.
Middleton, et al. v. Alredge, et. al, 2008 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 77352 (S.D. Miss.);
In the United States District Court for the Southern District of Mississippi, the firm successfully defended its client’s interests against plaintiff’s Motion for Class Certification in a case involving settlement against a diet drug manufacturer.
Disclaimer: These recoveries and testimonials are not an indication of future results. Every case is different, and regardless of what friends, family, or other individuals may say about what a case is worth, each case must be evaluated on its own facts and circumstances as they apply to the law. The valuation of a case depends on the facts, the injuries, the jurisdiction, the venue, the witnesses, the parties, and the testimony, among other factors. Furthermore, no representation is made that the quality of the legal services to be performed is greater than the quality of legal services performed by other lawyers.